Newspaper Ads from the 7 Rivers Region Classifieds from the 7 Rivers Region Jobs in the 7 Rivers Region Cars in the 7 Rivers Region Homes for Sale in the 7 Rivers Region Rental PRoperties in the 7 Rivers Region & Rivers Region Website Directory Shopping in the 7 Rivers Region
 SPONSOR LINKS
spacer

PRINT ADS

spacer
 Home > News > Story

Published - Tuesday, July 22, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (15 comment(s))

Heroes save toddler from drowning at Holmen pool

   Advertisement   
Advertise Info. Website Directory
Garret Nesler came all the way from Chesapeake, Ohio, to visit his family and wound up saving a little boy from drowning.
Photo by Jo Anne Killeen
.
Garret Nesler drove for about 12 hours over 731 miles to save a child. He thought he was just taking a family vacation from Chesapeake, Ohio, to visit his sick brother and his boyhood home in Holmen. Nevertheless, on Wednesday, July 9, he learned he was in Holmen for an even greater purpose — to help save a 3-year-old boy from drowning.

“God knew what he was doing,” Nesler said. “I give it to the glory of God that I was there and that little boy is OK.”

Nesler and his wife and two children were at the Holmen Aquatic Center Wednesday afternoon. Around 2 p.m. Nesler was getting his exercise by walking around in the water while his children, ages 9 and 7, played. He said he thought he was about 5 feet from the edge of the pool in 4-feet deep water and noticed something that didn’t sit well with him.

“I was walking in the pool and looked over and noticed a few kids about 8 to 10 years old playing around this other kid under the water,” Nesler said. He thought he saw one little girl holding the small boy but had let him go. He thought he heard the group of kids say "he’s playing dead."

“But he really looked limp to me,” Nesler said. “He was really blue. I went in and got him.”

A big man at 6-foot-5, Nesler had no problem lifting him out and putting him on the side of the pool. When Nesler had the little guy out of the water, he waved one arm to get the lifeguard to hurry.

“I could see there wasn’t much time. He needed help fast,” Nesler said. “I pulled him out of the water and started praying for him.”

Lifeguards put him on the deck of the pool and started administering mouth-to-mouth resuscitation. Nesler said very quickly two women came to ask if they could help.

“As soon as I got the boy over to the side of the pool, the lifeguard had about 20 seconds before one lady barged in and started mouth-to-mouth. Another lady that came by said she was a nurse and asked ‘Can I help?’ and she started chest compressions. They revived him before the first responders got there.

“The real special people were those two ladies who jumped in,” Nesler continued. “Thank God they were there. They stayed right with him the whole time, even when the first responders got there.”

While waiting for the first responders, everyone watched nervously for the little boy to start breathing again, according to Nesler. It was a big relief to everyone there when the boy started spitting water out.

“When he started spitting up water, I just said, “There it is!’ Shortly after that, he started crying pretty hard. I knew he would be OK.”

Nesler’s wife Teresa started praying as soon as she saw the boy in her husband’s arms.

“As soon as I saw the boy and how blue he was, I started praying,” Teresa said. “When I heard water spitting out of him, I was jumping for joy.”

Teresa said she had gone over to comfort the daycare provider that had lost track of him.

“She told me she had been frantically looking for him; he had just disappeared.” Teresa said the daycare provider had gone over to look over in the sand area thinking he might have gotten over there. The provider came back to the pool area just in time to see them lifting him out of the water.

“She was a wreck,” Teresa said. “She was so upset. So was everyone else. I was praying to God to calm down the two women who were trying to revive the boy. They were nervous and shaking, too.”

The Neslers could not confirm the story in last week’s Tribune that said two children were trying to drag the small child out of the water.

“I don’t know what happened before I came upon it,” Garret said. “They might have been dragging him over to the edge of the pool, but it looked to me and everyone else like they were playing with him.”

However, the important thing, said Holmen Parks and Recreation Director Mike Brogan, is that the boy is alive.

“The biggest thing is the child was released from the hospital, is doing well and was playing the next morning,” Brogan said. “That helped put the lifeguards at ease that everything was OK.”

Brogan said the lifeguards were getting ready to switch stations and one of the guards stayed because he had been watching the situation and things didn’t necessarily look right. Brogan would not name the lifeguards involved.

Brogan said the lifeguard reported there were “probably four or five other kids around the child, there was a girl that did initially picked him up and then the adult lifted him out of there. The guard blew a triple-whistle,” which indicates a save is in progress.

Brogen said there were approximately 17 lifeguards on duty at the time of the incident, although not all were outside on the pool grounds.

Brogan said the unfortunate incident should be a reminder to everyone about pool safety. He said there were about 200-250 patrons at the pool at that time and that it happened at the island area.

Brogan said the staff often get complaints about the rules stating small children have to be within an arm’s length of an adult and that small children with babysitters as young as 12 are not allowed at the pool.

“But this is exactly why we don’t allow that,” he said. “Little kids like that get into areas where they can’t stay afloat. This reemphasizes why we have those rules. This was a case of a young child in a place where he’s not supposed to be. The supervision rules are very important. With young children, you have to be out there with them.”

Brogan said that people need to be reminded to always be on the lookout for each other.

“Everybody is a lifeguard in a sense,” he said. “Watch out for each other. But that doesn’t mean everyone else is your babysitter.”

The newspaper was unable to obtain comment from the parents of the small boy, the daycare provider or the two women who helped.
.
   Advertisement   
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

Former Day Care Provider in Holmen wrote on Aug 26, 2008 8:51 PM:

" I am a former daycare provider in Holmen, and I also have to say that I have not taken my daycare children to the pool. Especially if they are that young. I do feel for her though...it was an accident. "

Re Slack wrote on Jul 26, 2008 8:44 AM:

" I don't agree with you slack. I have taken a some of my children to the pool this year. I don't take more than two, if I do my staff person comes with. My under three children stay in the less than 2 feet water. My four and older children stay with my staff person--ONLY IF THEY HAVE HAD SWIM LESSONS.

This child care provider was not doing her job. She is not a high quality provider. If she was this wouldn't have happen. I have never had an issue. Parents really need to look into their providers and not just send them to the cheapest one. Especially those that have no education. "

To amom wrote on Jul 25, 2008 1:36 PM:

" In a perfect world I would agree that we should only hire adults to serve as life guards but no adults will work for the money the lifeguards make. To raise those wages you would have to raise taxes and there are too many people that are on the "don't raise my taxes not matter what" bandwagon. If people just stood back and understood that with a high level of services go a higher cost but the problem is no one wants to pay and take the chance that it won't affect them. "

Slack wrote on Jul 24, 2008 2:52 PM:

" A daycare provider should not get "slack". It was her job to not take her eyes off of the boy. Her paid job. A home daycare has no business being at a deep pool. Fortunately this story has a happy ending. "

Former Holmen Resident wrote on Jul 24, 2008 9:42 AM:

" Why is everyone so quick to place blame? Isn't the most important thing that the child is alright? Several of the comments say that the lifeguard did nothing but stand by and watch after the child was pulled out of the water. Maybe you should go back and read the article closer before you make such accusations. It clearly states that the lifeguard started working on the little boy when the women barged in and took over. One of these was a nurse, a trained medical professional who was well qualified to be taking over. As for the daycare provider, accidents happen. If that had just been a mom that had lost track of her child for a minute would you be so quick to say she's a horrible mother and needs her children taken away? These things are bound to happen on a hot summer day with 250 people milling around the pool. Kids are quick and something like a child slipping into an area he's not supposed to be can happen in a matter of seconds. Cut the daycare provider some slack, it was an accident and thankfully everything turned out well. We should all just hope that if something like this ever happens to us that someone like Mr. Nesler or the two women who ran to the aid of the child are around to help. "

Daycare Provider wrote on Jul 23, 2008 7:42 AM:

" I am a licensed daycare provider in Minnesota. I have run a daycare for 20 years. I cannot comprehend ever taking my kids to anything but a "baby" pool. It's inconceivable that anyone would take this kind of risk. What are Wisconsin regulations on such activity? "

Gods angels wrote on Jul 23, 2008 1:15 AM:

" WOW! Truly an example of God's power and how he works through us in every day life, this extraordinary story of how this boy was saved from drowning by the quick actions of strangers, or angels in the moment of need. "

Amom wrote on Jul 22, 2008 12:31 PM:

" Judging aside, it was the JOB and RESPONSABILITY of the day care provider to know where that child was and to supervise him. It was also the JOB and RESPONSABILITY of the lifeguard to be guarding the safety of the people in the pool, especially small children. Had he had any concerns, he should have acted immediatly. This is why I sometimes wonder whether teenagers should be doing this type of job, they are just not mature enough to deal with things like this. Mistakes happen, I understand that, but, there still need to be sanctions for the mistakes made here. It could have been a little boys life. That could have been my little boy. "

Former Lifeguard wrote on Jul 22, 2008 3:57 AM:

" I can't believe that the lifeguards didn't even notice the boy under for so long. The way that the stations are set up, a lifeguard should have noticed immediately when that boy started struggling by not being able to keep his head above the water anymore. Back when I used to work at the aquatic center, lifeguards watched the water, not the cute boys. I think that this is a reality check for possible lawsuits in the future for the village because of lazy, inattentive lifeguards. Give those inattentive lifeguards that were working that section that day and time some sanctions. Also, don't let that daycare provider ever come back either!! "

HST wrote on Jul 21, 2008 8:11 AM:

" No one has the right to judge others. Treat others as you would like to be treated. "

Ruby Mom wrote on Jul 20, 2008 8:22 PM:

" I have to say that this wasn't an accident. This boys child care provider wasn't watching him. Of course there is no news about that. I want to know the provider and make sure she doesn't have a license anymore, that is if she was even licensed.

It doesn't matter who saved him. Thank goodness someone did.

Those parents should be filing suit against that provider. "

Dont be so quick wrote on Jul 19, 2008 10:20 PM:

" What I have heard is that the lifeguard did begin CPR but that the two women came forward and offered to help. ONe being an emergency room nurse and the other a medial assistant-both probalby much more experienced than this young lifeguard who may never again need to administer CPR in a lifetime. It sounds to me that everything came out okay-I am sure if these two medical personnel hadn't been there it would still have been okay - so let's not be so quick to judge and second guess and just celebrate that it was a good outcome. "

agree with wow wrote on Jul 19, 2008 1:10 PM:

" i was also there and still don't understand why the lifeguard could not help. when you train to be a lifeguard you are pretty aware that if a situation would come up that you aren't likely to have advanced notice that you will be giving CPR in 5 mins when someone isn't breathing---there are no "prepared" drownings. clearly it was an accident and the boy is so fortunate that the women were there and the adult that lifted him out......but why was the lifeguard just watching the situation and not stepping in? i keep trying to think of what i would do in the situation and the panic that could set in with the little boy in front of me not breathing, but i still just don't understand--- "

jen wrote on Jul 18, 2008 1:01 PM:

" i was there when this happened. it was so sad to watch, i have been wondering what the outcome of the whole situation was. i have been praying for the family of the boy. "

WOW wrote on Jul 18, 2008 11:27 AM:

" 17 lifeguards on duty and it was two nurses who just happened to be at the pool that saved his life.

Those two deserve a medal, and the lifeguards should be looking for a new job! "


The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Holmen Courier.

 Post a comment »

(optional)
   
Thank you for your comments! Once your comments are approved, they will appear on the site.
About Us | Advertise Online | Contact Us | Disclaimer | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | RSS | Webmaster | Website Directory
Copyright © 2006 The Holmen Courier. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.